RIDE SHARING EXCLUSIONS ON COMMERCIAL AUTO POLICIES
Odds are you have used such ride-sharing apps like Uber, Lyft, or Sidecar on a vacation, business trip, or getting to or from a sporting event, but did you ever think of the insurance implications? Ride-sharing businesses are different than taxi or livery businesses and not subject to the same insurance regulations (yet). A ride-sharing company connects passengers to drivers via a smart phone app usually on short notice but they can be arranged in advance. While you might expect that your personal auto policy is not designed to cover a side business as an Uber driver, you might not have thought about your employees and their use of your vehicle for the same.
Many carriers are including a mandatory exclusion on commercial auto policies called a Public or Livery Conveyance Exclusion.
If you are not in the business of livery or taxi services, the exclusion applies. The exclusion means there is NO auto coverage when logged into the ride-sharing network. The exclusion takes effect as soon as anyone logs into the network platform, not just IF they have an Uber/Lyft passenger in an auto. The exclusion applies to physical damage and uninsured motorist coverage as well as liability.
Exclusions Mean No Coverage
There would be a number of claim situations that would leave you exposed if an employee or anyone using a company vehicle causes third-party bodily injury or property damage. And remember unless endorsed to do so, most personal auto policies do not cover ride-sharing business operations either.
To combat prohibited usage and help protect your business, we recommend that you address the use of ride-sharing and ride-sharing programs/apps with company vehicles in your fleet safety manual. Additionally, discuss this issue with any non-employees (i.e. family members) that may have a company vehicle.
– Carrie Hodgens-True, CIC, CRIS
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
New Federal Guidance Tightens Oversight of Health Plan Data Sharing
Federal regulators have issued new guidance that will affect how employers manage health plan data sharing for the rest of 2026. The update comes in response to a rise in cybersecurity incidents involving third-party administrators, payroll vendors, and benefits platforms. While the rules do not create new penalties, they clarify that employers—not vendors—are ultimately responsible for protecting employee health information.
Mental Health Parity Requirements Remain in Effect
Mental health parity continues to be an important compliance obligation for employer-sponsored group health plans. While recent federal actions have created some confusion, employers should understand that the core requirements of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) remain in effect.
The 2026 Compliance Crunch: What Employers Must Do Before Fall
Employee benefits managers are facing one of the busiest compliance years in more than a decade. Several major federal requirements are converging at the same time, and most of them carry real penalties for employers that miss deadlines or fail to document their efforts. The result is a mid-year “compliance crunch” that is catching many organizations off guard.