The shift to a hybrid work model has created new challenges for employers, who must now accommodate remote and on-site employees.
According to Littler’s 10th Annual Employer Survey Report 2022, 86% of companies with remote workers or permanent remote work models cited maintaining company culture and employee engagement as their primary concerns.
Another critical challenge seems to be ensuring that remote and hybrid work flexibility is applied fairly, with 53% of respondents indicating that they are concerned about this. Many businesses are also concerned with communication and meeting efficiency (52%) and a decline in mentorship and professional growth opportunities (45%).
Other concerns included availability for in-person interactions with clients, customers, or third parties (40%) and scheduling obstacles with employees on-site on various days (28%). Only 2% of respondents did not have any concerns.
Return-to-Office Policies Do Not Equate to Lack of Options
Regarding returning to the office, 54% of survey respondents had already instituted return-to-office policies, 13% planned to return by August and another 13% planned to return at some point. This does not mean that work flexibility is a thing of the past, as it has become vital for talent acquisition and retention.
When asked to what extent their organization offered or considered offering remote work or other flexible solutions, 47% stated to a great extent, 37% said somewhat, 13% answered very little and only 3% said not at all.
These reactions are not surprising. According to a 2021 Ipsos survey, 30% of employees stated they would look for another job if they were forced to return to the office full time.
Group Disparities
According to a Future Forum Report, of the 10,737 knowledge workers surveyed, 78% wanted location flexibility while 95% wanted schedule flexibility. Interestingly, there seems to be some disparity between various groups.
For example, in the US, 86% of Hispanic/Latinx employees and 81% of Asian/Asian American and Black employees preferred hybrid or remote work models over 75% of white workers. Globally, 52% of women wanted to work mainly remotely, compared to 46% of men. Additionally, 37% of non-executives working remotely stated they would prefer to be in the office three or more days a week, compared to 75% of executives.
Such disparities could increase the risk of proximity biases, with 41% of executives stating that they are concerned over inequities developing between remote and in-office employees.
Copyright © 2022 Smarts Publishing. This is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel or an insurance professional for appropriate advice.
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
Putting HR Technology to Work: How INSURICA Clients Gain an Edge with OutSail
Payroll errors that hit the general ledger, open-enrollment portals that freeze at midnight, new hires juggling four log-ins on day one - when HR technology falters, the ripple effects reach every corner of the organization. Yet most employers still rely on a patchwork of legacy systems chosen under deadline pressure.
CPR and AED Training for School Staff: A Life-Saving Back-to-School Priority
As students return to campus, it’s important for school administrators to assess more than just academics and operations. One critical area that deserves attention is CPR and AED training for school staff. Ensuring your employees are prepared to respond to cardiac emergencies can save lives—and now is the perfect time to make it a priority.
Mental Health Parity Requirements are Still in Full Force—Even as New Federal Rules are Temporarily on Hold
In May 2025, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury announced a temporary pause in enforcement of the 2024 final rule under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), following a legal challenge brought by an employer coalition. This enforcement pause gives the agencies time to reexamine certain provisions and consider future revisions through the regulatory process.