COVID-19: Do You Have Liability?

Lawmakers are looking into legislation to shield employers against unreasonable liability due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

While some states have enacted laws shielding business from some liability, guidance varies greatly between jurisdictions regarding which businesses qualify for immunity; which actions or omissions are protected; and how long immunity lasts.

A proposed federal law, the Safe to Work Act, S. 4317, would temporarily protect businesses, nonprofits, health providers and educational institutions that follow public health guidelines. However, the proposed legislation would still hold businesses accountable for willful misconduct and gross negligence.

The federal proposal would apply retroactively to pending coronavirus-related actions through at least Sept. 30, 2024.

Here are some types of COVID-19 liabilities businesses and employers could face in the private sector:

  • General Liability: Lawsuits already have been filed by individuals and groups alleging that certain businesses did not follow recommended precautions and therefore failed to protect the public. These lawsuits are difficult to prove since the virus is widespread and the modes of exposure and transmission often are difficult to pinpoint.
  • Breach of Contract: Businesses that require pre-payment for services could be sued for failure to pay refunds or reschedule events and services.
  • Products Liability: These lawsuits allege that personal protective equipment and/or health and safety products were defective.
  • Workers’ Compensation: Employees who say they contracted the coronavirus at work face the same challenges as individuals who are filing general liability lawsuits. They must prove the exposure occurred at work or while the employee was acting on behalf of the employer.
  • Medical Care and Diagnostics: Medical malpractice cases may be filed regarding the diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus-infected patients — by physicians, hospitals or labs. Lawsuits are expected against nursing homes for failing to properly diagnose, treat and/or quarantine patients or for failing to enact and enforce proper protocols.

Copyright © 2020 Smarts Publishing

About the Author

INSURICA
INSURICA

Share This Story

Stay Updated

Subscribe to the INSURICA blog and receive the latest news direct to your inbox.

Related Blogs

Trump Administration Reshapes Health Plan Oversight

November 5th, 2025|Blog, Employee Benefits, Trending|

The Trump administration has issued a series of executive orders aimed at recalibrating federal oversight of employer-sponsored health plans. These directives target unpublished rules and agency enforcement priorities, signaling a shift toward deregulation and increased flexibility for plan sponsors.

Compliance Update: Gag Clause Attestations, Contraceptive Coverage Ruling, and SF Ordinance Impacts

November 4th, 2025|Blog, Employee Benefits, Trending|

As Q4 begins, benefits managers face a trio of compliance developments with implications for plan design, documentation, and year-end filings. Two are federal in scope, while one local ordinance continues to affect employers nationwide.

Benefits Administration Update: MLR Rebates, Texas SB 1332, and Year-End Priorities

November 3rd, 2025|Blog, Employee Benefits, Trending|

As the final quarter of 2025 begins, several developments in benefits administration are reshaping how employers manage compliance, coverage, and communications. From rebate distribution rules to state-level legislation, benefits managers should take note of key updates that may affect plan operations and documentation heading into year-end.

Go to Top