COVID-19: Do You Have Liability?
Lawmakers are looking into legislation to shield employers against unreasonable liability due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
While some states have enacted laws shielding business from some liability, guidance varies greatly between jurisdictions regarding which businesses qualify for immunity; which actions or omissions are protected; and how long immunity lasts.
A proposed federal law, the Safe to Work Act, S. 4317, would temporarily protect businesses, nonprofits, health providers and educational institutions that follow public health guidelines. However, the proposed legislation would still hold businesses accountable for willful misconduct and gross negligence.
The federal proposal would apply retroactively to pending coronavirus-related actions through at least Sept. 30, 2024.
Here are some types of COVID-19 liabilities businesses and employers could face in the private sector:
- General Liability: Lawsuits already have been filed by individuals and groups alleging that certain businesses did not follow recommended precautions and therefore failed to protect the public. These lawsuits are difficult to prove since the virus is widespread and the modes of exposure and transmission often are difficult to pinpoint.
- Breach of Contract: Businesses that require pre-payment for services could be sued for failure to pay refunds or reschedule events and services.
- Products Liability: These lawsuits allege that personal protective equipment and/or health and safety products were defective.
- Workers’ Compensation: Employees who say they contracted the coronavirus at work face the same challenges as individuals who are filing general liability lawsuits. They must prove the exposure occurred at work or while the employee was acting on behalf of the employer.
- Medical Care and Diagnostics: Medical malpractice cases may be filed regarding the diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus-infected patients — by physicians, hospitals or labs. Lawsuits are expected against nursing homes for failing to properly diagnose, treat and/or quarantine patients or for failing to enact and enforce proper protocols.
Copyright © 2020 Smarts Publishing
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
New Federal Guidance Tightens Oversight of Health Plan Data Sharing
Federal regulators have issued new guidance that will affect how employers manage health plan data sharing for the rest of 2026. The update comes in response to a rise in cybersecurity incidents involving third-party administrators, payroll vendors, and benefits platforms. While the rules do not create new penalties, they clarify that employers—not vendors—are ultimately responsible for protecting employee health information.
Mental Health Parity Requirements Remain in Effect
Mental health parity continues to be an important compliance obligation for employer-sponsored group health plans. While recent federal actions have created some confusion, employers should understand that the core requirements of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) remain in effect.
The 2026 Compliance Crunch: What Employers Must Do Before Fall
Employee benefits managers are facing one of the busiest compliance years in more than a decade. Several major federal requirements are converging at the same time, and most of them carry real penalties for employers that miss deadlines or fail to document their efforts. The result is a mid-year “compliance crunch” that is catching many organizations off guard.