EXPEDITED DISPUTE RESOLUTION BONDS: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
Did you know that bonds are required to help guarantee performance, payment, and maintenance terms on a project to the owner/obligee? When bonds are in place, everything should run smoothly in the event of the dreaded bond claim right? Wrong. Typically, bond claims can take many weeks, if not months, for a resolution, regardless of the outcome.
The extended delay in resolution can cause project stoppage, incur damages, and extend the final delivery of the project to the owner. Most bond forms don’t specifically address a timeframe or action plan for dispute resolution. Over the last couple of years the surety industry has looked to help in this issue by adopting what is known as an Expedited Dispute Resolution bond, more commonly known as an EDR bond. The EDR’s primary goal is expedite disputes. It defines time frames in which the surety has to investigate, whether performance or payment related, typically in less than 30-45 days. This can help avoid nasty penalties and delays from the owner and it ultimately keeps projects running on schedule as all parties involved are to continue work throughout the process. It’s worth noting that EDR bonds are not right for every project, but if utilized correctly, are a very effective solution for owners, general contractors, and subcontractors in the event there is a claim.
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
The Role of School Resource Officers (SROs): Legal & Safety Considerations
School safety remains a top priority for districts, educators, [...]
Telehealth 2.0 Gains Momentum as Virtual Specialty Care Expands in 2026
Virtual care is entering a new phase in 2026, with employers seeing rapid growth in Telehealth 2.0 — a more integrated, data driven model that blends virtual visits, remote monitoring, and AI supported clinical decision tools. Analysts describe this shift as a move from “occasional convenience” to a core component of everyday care delivery.
Mental Health Parity Enforcement Part 2: A New Compliance Reality for Employers
Mental health parity has been a compliance requirement for more than a decade, but 2026 marks a decisive shift in how aggressively federal agencies are enforcing it. Employers who once relied on carriers to “handle parity in the background” are now discovering that regulators expect detailed documentation, transparent processes, and clear evidence that mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits are administered on equal terms with medical and surgical benefits.