The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly known as Obamacare, levies hefty penalties on employers who do not comply with key provisions of the law.

The Employer Mandate Penalty

Also known as the “pay or play” provision, the employer mandate stipulates that companies with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees must offer a health plan with minimum essential coverage to a minimum of 95% of their full-time workforce and dependents up to age 26. Failure to do so triggers a penalty under Section 4980H(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The 2024 employer mandate penalty is $2,970 per full-time employee, excluding the first 30 workers. For example, an employer with 100 full-time employees that does not offer coverage would pay $207,900 (100 – 30 = 70 x $2,970). This assumes at least one employee obtains subsidized marketplace coverage.

The Affordability Penalty

Even if an employer offers coverage, they may still face penalties under Section 4980H(b) if the plan fails to meet minimum value or affordability standards. This occurs when an employee obtains subsidized marketplace coverage because the employer’s plan is unaffordable or does not meet minimum value. The monthly penalty equals $4,460 (for 2024) divided by 12 for each full-time employee who receives subsidized marketplace coverage. The total penalty cannot exceed the amount the employer would pay if it offered no coverage.

For a company with 300 full-time employees, the maximum monthly penalty would be $66,825 (300 – 30 = 270 x $2,970/12). However, the actual penalty would depend on how many employees obtain subsidized marketplace policies.

Avoiding Penalties

To avoid these penalties, coverage must be offered, and it must provide minimum essential coverage, meet minimum value and affordability tests. Minimum essential coverage means the health plan is employer sponsored. Minimum value means the plan pays for at least 60% of covered health expenses. Affordability means employee premium contributions do not exceed 8.39% of household income in 2024. Employers can use safe harbors based on W-2 wages, or rate of pay, or Federal Poverty Level to assess affordability.

For more employee benefits resources and industry insights, contact INSURICA today.

Copyright © 2023 Smarts Publishing. This is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel or an insurance professional for appropriate advice. 

About the Author

INSURICA
INSURICA

Share This Story

Stay Updated

Subscribe to the INSURICA blog and receive the latest news direct to your inbox.

Related Blogs

Trump Administration Reshapes Health Plan Oversight

November 5th, 2025|Blog, Employee Benefits, Trending|

The Trump administration has issued a series of executive orders aimed at recalibrating federal oversight of employer-sponsored health plans. These directives target unpublished rules and agency enforcement priorities, signaling a shift toward deregulation and increased flexibility for plan sponsors.

Compliance Update: Gag Clause Attestations, Contraceptive Coverage Ruling, and SF Ordinance Impacts

November 4th, 2025|Blog, Employee Benefits, Trending|

As Q4 begins, benefits managers face a trio of compliance developments with implications for plan design, documentation, and year-end filings. Two are federal in scope, while one local ordinance continues to affect employers nationwide.

Benefits Administration Update: MLR Rebates, Texas SB 1332, and Year-End Priorities

November 3rd, 2025|Blog, Employee Benefits, Trending|

As the final quarter of 2025 begins, several developments in benefits administration are reshaping how employers manage compliance, coverage, and communications. From rebate distribution rules to state-level legislation, benefits managers should take note of key updates that may affect plan operations and documentation heading into year-end.

Go to Top