DO GENERAL CONTRACTORS NEED PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE?
Commercial General Liability policies were not designed, nor do they include coverage, for Professional Liability. There is a perception that contractors do not need professional liability coverage, but this isn’t a safe assumption. Professional Services are generally those that require specialized knowledge, labor or skill, and this knowledge is predominantly intellectual, rather than physical. In other words, professional services are those in which providers are paid for what they know – for their professional opinions. We are accustomed to seeing Professional Liability exclusions for architects, engineers, surveyors, and other professionals. It’s easy to understand why many assume this exclusion does not apply to a contractor.
The troubling part of this perception has to do with some of the terms used in the Professional Liability Exclusion. Professional Services that are excluded may be “… preparing, approving or failing to prepare or approve…reports, field orders, change orders, supervisory…. [or] inspections …” Most General Contractors are probably engaged in some – or all – of these activities.
It’s important to be aware of this possible gap in a General Liability policy. You may want to consider obtaining a proposal for coverage for Contractor’s Professional Liability.
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
RxDC Reporting: What Employers Should Do Before the June 1 Deadline
Each year, group health plans must report detailed prescription drug and healthcare spending data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This reporting—commonly referred to as RxDC reporting—is due by June 1 and applies to most employer-sponsored group health plans that offer prescription drug coverage.
Chronic Condition Management 2.0: GLP-1 Alternatives and New Digital Therapeutics
Chronic conditions have long been the primary driver of employer healthcare spending, but 2026 marks a turning point in how organizations are approaching prevention, treatment, and long-term management. With GLP-1 medications dominating headlines — and budgets — employers are urgently exploring complementary or alternative strategies that can improve outcomes without unsustainable cost growth. The result is a new wave of digital therapeutics, metabolic health programs, and integrated care models that promise a more balanced approach to chronic disease management.
The Return-to-Office Reset: How Benefits Are Being Re-Engineered in 2026
After several years of experimentation, many employers are tightening hybrid schedules or requiring more in-office days. This “return-to-office reset” is reshaping benefits strategies as organizations look for ways to support commuting employees, improve onsite experience, and maintain flexibility. What began as a workplace policy shift is now driving a broader rethinking of how benefits can reinforce culture, productivity, and retention.