Machines and equipment used in the workplace will inevitably require maintenance. Many of these machines can be dangerous for employees to work on due to having to reach into areas of operation where possible hazards exist. As such, it’s important to make sure that a machine is turned off while an employee is working on it. Performing regular maintenance on a piece of equipment can result in serious injury or even death if part of their body is inside a machine and it is activated.
Controlling hazardous energy, also known as lockout, ensures that maintenance can be performed safely and that a machine’s sources of energy are locked and unable to be turned on.
In some situations, lockout may not be possible. When this happens, the tagout process is used. Tagout refers to simply tagging a machine with language instructing employees not to use it, while the former physically prevents use. Tagout provides less safety for employees and should therefore only be used in situations in which equipment cannot be locked out. Keep reading for more information on the control of hazardous energy.
Hazardous Sources of Energy
When applying lockout to a machine, it is important to understand all of its sources of energy. Possible hazardous sources of energy that employees may be dealing with include electrical, hydraulic, mechanical, pneumatic, gravity, chemical, thermal and steam.
All employees should be provided with a machine-specific procedure that documents all pieces of equipment that can be locked out for maintenance.
Machine-specific procedures are sets of written instructions that address each individual machine and detail the energy sources that must be controlled.
These procedures list the steps to shut down the equipment, perform lockout, isolate the energy sources, and, eventually, restore power to the machine safely. The procedures also explain the process of releasing stored energy and testing equipment to ensure there is no residual energy stored that could become hazardous.
Authorized & Affected Employees
Not all employees are authorized to perform lockout procedures on equipment. Even if you think you know how to conduct the process, the slightest error can still result in a serious accident.
Unauthorized employees should not only refrain from attempting to lock out a machine, but also avoid working on a machine that has been locked out by authorized personnel. Any employee who conducts maintenance should also be the one locking it, and, in situations when there is more than one employee working on a machine, each authorized employee should apply their own locks.
In Conclusion
Whenever a new piece of equipment is introduced to the workplace, lockout procedures will be developed.
If you ever notice that a machine does not have its own machine-specific procedure, if the existing procedure is incorrect, or if you have any other questions or concerns about the control of hazardous energy, speak with your supervisor.
For more risk management resouces, contact INSURICA today.
This is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel or an insurance professional for appropriate advice. ©2025 Zywave, Inc. All rights reserved
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
RxDC Reporting: What Employers Should Do Before the June 1 Deadline
Each year, group health plans must report detailed prescription drug and healthcare spending data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This reporting—commonly referred to as RxDC reporting—is due by June 1 and applies to most employer-sponsored group health plans that offer prescription drug coverage.
Chronic Condition Management 2.0: GLP-1 Alternatives and New Digital Therapeutics
Chronic conditions have long been the primary driver of employer healthcare spending, but 2026 marks a turning point in how organizations are approaching prevention, treatment, and long-term management. With GLP-1 medications dominating headlines — and budgets — employers are urgently exploring complementary or alternative strategies that can improve outcomes without unsustainable cost growth. The result is a new wave of digital therapeutics, metabolic health programs, and integrated care models that promise a more balanced approach to chronic disease management.
The Return-to-Office Reset: How Benefits Are Being Re-Engineered in 2026
After several years of experimentation, many employers are tightening hybrid schedules or requiring more in-office days. This “return-to-office reset” is reshaping benefits strategies as organizations look for ways to support commuting employees, improve onsite experience, and maintain flexibility. What began as a workplace policy shift is now driving a broader rethinking of how benefits can reinforce culture, productivity, and retention.