Wellness programs aim to improve employee health and well-being. But many miss the mark on inclusivity, potentially doing more harm than good by alienating swaths of the workforce. Experts say now is the time for employers to take a hard look at their offerings to ensure programs nurture all employees.
Rethinking Wellness Program Goals and Messaging
Typical wellness challenges focus narrowly on physical fitness and weight loss, premised on assumptions that employees aren't active or fit enough. This narrative fails to recognize that health encompasses much more than diet and exercise habits. Often this approach can shame and deter the very employees such programs aim to help.
Well-being encompasses physical, mental, emotional, financial, and even spiritual health. Employees have diverse abilities, disabilities, interests, and access to resources. Programs centered solely around fitness paint an incomplete picture of health and disenfranchise some people by setting arbitrary benchmarks.
Experts advocate that employers shift the focus from weight loss to holistic well-being. Messaging should also emphasize personal milestones over competition. Options like yoga, mindfulness, and financial education demonstrate how companies value all dimensions of health.
Checking Programs for Built-In Biases
Before advertising yet another step challenge, employers may want to determine whether their current offerings accommodate people across the spectrum. Do activities include modifications for various abilities, disabilities, and fitness levels? Have organizers considered how medical conditions—both visible and invisible — may limit participation? What about economic barriers inherent in certain sports?
A program focused on an activity like cycling, for instance, presumes employees own expensive equipment and live near accessible trails. Such selection bias risks alienating those unable or uninterested in participating in that particular activity.
Promoting Optional Participation
Mandating involvement in wellness initiatives frequently backfires. Employees pressured to join fitness competitions or hit health metrics can feel singled out or ashamed if unable to meet goals. Stress over forced participation compounds if workers fear reprisals.
Experts advise that employers allow employees to opt into programs voluntarily. This approach respects individual readiness to pursue behavior change while giving workers autonomy over sensitive health issues. Participation hinges on genuine personal investment rather than coercion. Education and incentives work better to drive engagement.
Prioritizing Inclusivity in Program Facilitators
Many organizations hire external partners to orchestrate wellness programs. Experts emphasize that employers must confirm third-party instructors or that facilitators receive training on leading inclusive, accessible sessions.
If not, uninformed program leaders risk alienating participants through insensitive remarks or fail to provide appropriate modifications. Employers should probe partners on their expertise to run inclusive workshops and preparedness to adapt activities as necessary.
Offering Broad Programming to Attract All Employees
Wellness programs shouldn't just be about scheduling Zumba classes at lunch. Truly inclusive offerings incorporate activities that align with a variety of interests and not just physical pursuits such as team sports or 5Ks.
Experts suggest providing sessions both during and outside working hours to remove scheduling barriers. Recording any workshops enables on-demand access for remote employees or those working nonstandard shifts. Consider book clubs, volunteer projects, continuing education, mental health seminars, and family outings to support holistic well-being.
Surveying Employees to Continuously Improve
The path to inclusive wellness requires regularly checking in with employees to assess their evolving needs and interests. Anonymous surveys and focus groups yield candid input on how current offerings hit or miss the mark.
Program participation metrics also reveal uptake gaps amongst certain groups. Experts stress that employers must listen to feedback, review participation data and take action to incrementally improve.
For more Employee Benefits resouces, contact INSURICA today.
Copyright © 2025 Smarts Publishing. This is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel or an insurance professional for appropriate advice.Â
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
Making an Acquisition? Why the EMOD Shouldn’t Be Overlooked
When acquiring another company, there’s no shortage of factors to consider. From valuing physical assets to estimating potential synergies, the due diligence process can be complex. However, one critical element often overlooked is the EMOD.
2026 Employer Mandate Update
In July 2025, the IRS released new guidance increasing both the affordability percentage and penalty amounts under the Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate for the 2026 plan year. These changes will affect how Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) determine affordability and assess compliance risk moving into the next benefits cycle.
Facility Rental: Best Practices for Non-School Use
As community hubs, school districts often open their doors to outside organizations for events, activities, and gatherings. This facility rental for non-school use can benefit the community, but it also comes with potential risks. School administrators must take proactive steps to protect district property, reduce liability exposure, and ensure compliance with state laws.