Environmental Liabilities at Food Processing Facilities
The most common environmental and regulatory exposures encountered at food processing facilities include:
- No spill control and countermeasure plans for chemical or fuel spills.
- Noncompliant wastewater discharges to surface waters and publicly
owned treatment works (POTWs). - Underground tanks that were removed or abandoned for unknown
reasons. - Poorly managed underground storage tanks and associated pipes.
- No formal aboveground tank inspection testing procedures.
- Un-diked aboveground tanks.
- Improperly maintained electrical units which contain PCBs.
- Inadequate control of nuisance emissions and odors.
- Facility personnel not witnessing deliveries of fuels and liquids.
- Poor spill control at tanker/rail car unloading/loading stations.
- Poor hazardous waste handling and disposal practices.
- Chlorine gas storage without proper detection and alert equipment.
- Improper wash-down procedures causing discharge problems.
- No SARA Title III/Community Right-to-Know reporting.
- Inadequate monitoring of non-permitted storm water outfalls.
- Poor historical information on previous use of property.
- Uncontained floor drains around the plant site.
This is not an exhaustive list of environmental exposures. It represents the most common environmental exposures for this industry. INSURICA
will work with you to identify environmental exposures that are unique to your business to help you reduce risk.
For more risk management guidance, contact INSURICA today.
This article is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel or an insurance professional for appropriate advice. Reprinted with permission from the Society of Environmental Insurance Professionals.
About the Author
Share This Story
Related Blogs
Fiduciary Responsibilities for Employer Health Plans: What Employers Should Know Now
When employers think about fiduciary responsibility, retirement plans often come to mind first. But recent developments make it clear that fiduciary duties also matter—sometimes significantly—when it comes to employer-sponsored health and welfare plans.
The New Era of Mental Health Parity Enforcement in 2026
Federal agencies have made mental health parity enforcement a top priority in 2026, and employers sponsoring group health plans are feeling the impact. Regulators are no longer satisfied with high‑level assurances that plans comply with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). Instead, they expect detailed, data‑driven documentation showing that mental health and substance‑use‑disorder benefits are truly comparable to medical and surgical benefits. This includes not only the written plan design but also how rules are applied in real‑world scenarios.
The 2026 Specialty Drug Surge: What Employers Need to Prepare For
Specialty drugs have been a major cost driver for years, but 2026 marks a significant shift in both scale and urgency. With GLP 1 medications expanding into new indications, gene therapies entering the market at record pace, and oncology drugs continuing to rise in both cost and utilization, specialty medications are projected to account for more than 60% of total pharmacy spending this year. That’s a dramatic change for employers, especially considering that specialty drugs represent fewer than 5% of total prescriptions.